Categories
The Benchmark

History is against US dollar domination

June 24, 2024


One currency to rule them all…

Dear Reader,

The drachma, the ducat, the denarii.

Such words might befit characters or kingdoms in Game of Thrones or Lord of The Rings.

But fictional monikers they are not.

You’d be forgiven for not knowing what these things really are; past reserve currencies of the world.

As we’ve covered, humans are prone to short-term thinking — in both directions.

We don’t think far into the past or future.

Our sense of the financial world is very much prone to such short-term thinking.

Most of us wouldn’t have a problem naming the world’s reserve currency — the US dollar.

But what about the previous reserve currency? And the one before that?

This edition of The Benchmark takes you back further than the recent past, revealing the three currencies that ran the world before the US dollar…

And speculating about what might replace the reserve currency we take for granted in the current economic status quo.

Reserve status: Safe, strong, stable


Let’s start with a reserve currency’s general definition:

A reserve currency is a foreign currency, held in large amounts by central banks and monetary authorities.

It can be used for international transactions and investments.

It’s often considered a ‘safe haven’.

Historically, reserve currencies have shared several key characteristics that secured their status, among them:

Strength and stability: A reserve currency typically originates from a nation with a robust and influential economy.

Power: Stable and reliable political institutions are crucial, as they ensure continuity and predictability in economic policies and governance.

Historically, the issuing country often possessed significant military strength, which helped protect its economic interests.

Trade: The nation behind a reserve currency usually has extensive and well-established trade networks.

This facilitates widespread use of the currency in international trade and finance.

Confidence: Institutions like central banks and stable legal frameworks help build trust in the currency’s stability and reliability.

Acceptance: The currency must be widely accepted and used in international transactions and held by governments and institutions as part of their foreign exchange reserves.

US dollar dominance: 1944-?


Right now, the US dollar fits these criteria.

The US is the largest economy on the planet in terms of nominal GDP.

Its political and military influence both have massive international influence.

Its trading networks are extensive.

Its central banks virtually determine global monetary policy.

And despite challengers rising to threaten its acceptance, generally speaking, the US dollar goes a long way in most places on earth.

Our current global reserve currency ascended to its dominant position at the tail end of the World War II with the Bretton Woods Agreement — which created a system in which the 44 signing nation states agreed to guarantee convertibility to the US dollar.

In other words, the allied nations prepared for a post-war world in which they’d do business in dollars.

Eighty years hence, the US dollar remains the global reserve currency.

But what about before that?

1800s to 1900s: British Pound Sterling (GBP)


The British Pound Sterling rose to prominence as the world’s primary reserve currency during the 19th and early 20th centuries.

This period coincided — no surprises — with the height of the British Empire, which spanned continents and facilitated extensive global trade.

The industrial revolution, which began in Britain, further solidified its economic dominance. London was the world’s financial hub, with the City of London the heart of finance and trade.

The Pound was directly linked to a specific amount of gold, which provided stability and confidence in the currency.

Two World Wars and their subsequent economic strain significantly weakened the British economy, setting up the Bretton Woods system outlined above.

1700s to 1800s: French Franc (FRF)


The French Franc was a prominent reserve currency during the 18th and early 19th centuries, particularly under Louis XIV and Naploleon. France’s significant influence in European politics, military power, and economic strength during this period underpinned the Franc’s status.

Like the Pound, the Franc drew much of its power from international trade and finance facilitated by France’s extensive colonial empire, which spanned Africa, the Americas, and Asia.

Under Louis XIV, France pursued policies of economic centralization and standardization, including issuing a stable currency, which helped bolster the Franc’s credibility.

Napoleon established the Banque de France in 1800. This further strengthened the country’s financial system and the Franc’s international standing.

The Napoleonic Code, which reformed legal systems across Europe, also promoted the use of the Franc in international dealings.

The French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars caused economic instability and significant fluctuations in the value of the Franc, which managed to remain a key currency in Europe until the rise of the British Empire in the mid-19th century.

1600s to 1700s: Dutch Guilder (NLG)


The Dutch Guilder was a dominant reserve currency during the 17th and 18th centuries. This period was the Dutch Golden Age.

The Netherlands, particularly through the influence of the Dutch East India Company, emerged as a leading global trading and financial power.

The Bank of Amsterdam, established in 1609, was one of the first central banks and played a crucial role in stabilizing and promoting the use of the Guilder for international trade.

The Guilder’s prominence was closely tied to the Netherlands’ strategic maritime position and its control over critical trade routes. Dutch merchants and bankers established extensive networks that spanned from the Americas to Asia, where the Guilder grew to be widely accepted.

The Dutch’s innovative financial practices, including modern banking, stock exchanges, and insurance, further strengthened the Gilder as reserve currency, with Amsterdam the centre of the financial world.

What weakened it? You can probably guess:

The Dutch started fighting wars against the English and the French. The Dutch Golden Age reached its end, and the guilder lost its reserve status as the French, then the English, took their turns at the centre of the financial world.

As you can see…

No reserve currency has ever retained its status


What’s a common theme in the three previous reserve currency mini-histories above?

War is not good for maintaining stability and influence.

Nor is political upheaval.

While the past isn’t necessarily a guide to the future, it’s true that those who forget the past are, probably, doomed to repeat it.

Which begs the question: When the US dollar does lose its place at the top of the world financial pecking order, what’s going to take its place?

Here are some of the main contenders:

The Euro (EUR): The Eurozone collectively represents one of the largest economies in the world. The EU has extensive trade relationships, advanced financial markets and institutions.

Chinese Yuan (Renminbi, CNY): China is the world’s second-largest economy and the largest trading nation. It has been actively promoting the international use of the Yuan. Reserve banks around the world are now increasingly including it in their reserves.

Cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin): Cryptocurrencies operate on decentralized networks, offering an alternative to traditional fiat currencies. They’re increasingly becoming used for global transactions and stores of value, and represent a potential paradigm shift away from fiat as a reserve currency in the future.

For now, though, the US dollar remains dominant.

It has the established trust, liquidity, and influence backing it up despite significant macroeconomic and geopolitical factors threatening its position.

Only one thing is certain: No reserve currency in history has ever maintained its dominance indefinitely — they have all failed and been replaced.

Maybe this time its different?

Love to know your thoughts — reply to this email with your take/predictions!

Quote of the week

The greatest remaining power that the United States has is the reserve currency, which gives us — I mean, you print the world’s money… And then simultaneously, it is at risk because we’re printing a lot of money. We’re creating a lot of debt. And so if you look at the cycles, that becomes an issue.

Ray Dalio

That’s it for this week’s The Benchmark email.

Forward this to anyone you know who needs to read it.

And, if one of our awesome subscribers has forwarded it to you…

Subscribe here for weekly emails with ideas, stories and content about long-term, high-performance investing!

Invest in knowledge,

Thom
Editor, The Benchmark

Unsubscribe · Preferences

All information contained in The Benchmark and on navexa.io is for education and informational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional financial or tax advice. The Benchmark and any contributors to The Benchmark are not financial professionals, and are not aware of your personal financial circumstances.

Categories
The Benchmark

Insane stock picker’s 13-year rampage

June 17, 2024


The investor who outperformed
Buffett (for 13 years in a row)

Dear Reader,

Warren Buffett is the undisputed King of Investing in the modern age.

But he didn’t win his crown without facing his challengers.

Buffett’s now-legendary 19.8% annualized return was, for more than a decade, beaten fair and square by a lesser-known benchmark-beating legend.

Peter Lynch is the investor, mutual fund manager, author, and the man who took Fidelity Investment’s Magellan Fund on a 13-year rampage between 1977 and 1990 to beat the benchmark S&P 500 by more than 2X every year.

Coining the ‘ten bagger’


Peter Peter Benchmark Beater (source)

A ‘ten bagger’ is a 10X return on an investment.

It turns a $10,000 investment into $100,000.

Peter Lynch invented the phrase, because he needed something to describe what kept happening to the stocks he bought during his time running the Magellan fund.

All told, Lynch invested in more than 100 ten baggers including:

  • Fannie Mae
  • Ford
  • Phillip Morris International
  • Taco Bell
  • General Electric

He even bagged a 900%+ gain on, of all things, Dunkin’ Donuts.

Let me just repeat the fact:

Peter Lynch successfully invested in more than 100 stocks that went up 10X or more.

That’s not luck. That’s strategy.

And it’s this supreme strategic approach that drove the Magellan Fund up 29.2% for 13 years straight.

$1,000 in, $28,000 out


S&P 500 = obliterated (source)

In 1977, Peter Lynch assumed leadership of the then little-known Magellan Fund, which managed a modest $18 million in assets.

By the time Lynch stepped down as the fund manager in 1990, the fund had skyrocketed to more than $14 billion in assets, encompassing more than 1,000 individual stock positions.

This remarkable growth can be attributed to Lynch’s unique approach to investing. Operating with minimal restrictions — except for regulatory limits, such as not being able to hold more than 5% of his total portfolio assets in a single company at the time of purchase — Lynch was free to explore a wide array of investment opportunities.

Which meant he was pretty free to focus on individual stocks.

He initially targeted large US companies but progressively shifted his attention to smaller and international stocks, thereby diversifying the fund’s portfolio and enhancing its growth potential.

And grow it did.

Between 1977 and 1990, Lynch’s Magellan Fund boasted an average annual return of 29.2%, securing its place in history as the mutual fund with the best 20-year return as of 2003.

One thousand dollars invested the day Peter Lynch took over the fund, and sold the day he quit, would have turned into $28,000 — a 2,700% total return.

So, how exactly did he pick the 10 baggers that propelled the fund to such insane returns?

Lynch loved ‘story stocks’

Peter Lynch was renowned for his ‘story’ investing approach.

He anchored many of his stock picks in a well-founded expectation of the company’s growth prospects.

These expectations stemmed from the company’s ‘story’ — a clear narrative about what the company planned to do or what events were anticipated to drive its success.

Lynch emphasized that familiarity and a deep understanding of a company’s business and competitive environment significantly enhanced the likelihood of identifying a compelling ‘story’ that would materialize.

As he famously put it, he preferred investing in ‘pantyhose rather than communications satellites,’ and ‘motel chains rather than fiber optics’.

As mentioned, Lynch picked more than 100 ten baggers — many of them ‘story stocks’.

But, a story was far from the only criteria he used on Magellan’s 13-year, 29.2% p.a., run.

10 benchmark-beating commandments


Lynch’s One Up On Wall Street (source)

The following are just some of the tenets Peter Lynch used to turn $1,000 invested into his Magellan fund into $28,000 in little more than a decade.

  1. Invest in What You Know: Lynch liked investing in companies he understood. He did not, however, understand Apple, and thus did not invest — to his regret.
  2. Bottom-Up Stock Picking: Lynch focused on the fundamentals of individual companies rather than getting overly concerned with macroeconomic trends.
  3. Prediction Is Futile: Lynch believed that trying to predict macroeconomic trends or interest rates was a waste of time. Instead, he focused on analyzing individual companies.
  4. Take Time to Identify Exceptional Companies: Lynch advised patience and taking the time to thoroughly research and understand a company before investing.
  5. Avoid Long Shots: Lynch warned against investing in high-risk, speculative stocks with unproven business models or uncertain futures.
  6. Good Management is Paramount: Lynch looked for companies with competent, honest, and shareholder-friendly management teams who can execute their business strategies effectively.
  7. Be Flexible and Humble, Learn from Mistakes: Lynch emphasized the importance of being adaptable and willing to change your mind based on new information. He also advised learning from investment mistakes and not being afraid to sell a stock if the original investment thesis no longer held.
  8. Explain Why You Buy: Investors should have a clear rationale for buying a stock. This includes understanding the company’s business, growth prospects, valuation, and how it fits into their overall investment strategy.
  9. Tune Out The Noise: Lynch pointed out that there will always be negative news or reasons to be cautious. Successful investors learn to tune out the noise and focus on the fundamentals of their investments.
  10. Invest for the Long Term: Lynch was a strong advocate of long-term investing. He believed in holding stocks for extended periods to allow the underlying businesses to grow and compound value. This approach also helps to ride out market volatility and benefit from the long-term appreciation of well-chosen investments.

Quote of the week

Actually, Wall Street thinks just as the Greeks did. The early Greeks used to sit around for days and debate how many teeth a horse has. They thought they could figure it out by just sitting there, instead of checking the horse.

Peter Lynch, in One Up On Wall Street

That’s it for this week’s The Benchmark email.

Forward this to anyone you know who needs to read it.

And, if one of our awesome subscribers has forwarded it to you…

Subscribe here for weekly emails with ideas, stories and content about long-term, high-performance investing!

Invest in knowledge,

Thom
Editor, The Benchmark

Unsubscribe · Preferences

All information contained in The Benchmark and on navexa.io is for education and informational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional financial or tax advice. The Benchmark and any contributors to The Benchmark are not financial professionals, and are not aware of your personal financial circumstances.

Categories
The Benchmark

World’s wealthiest families laid bare!

June 10, 2024


Unpacked: 2024 UBS Global Family Office Report

Dear Reader,

The world’s wealthiest families have laid it all bare.

They’re worried about wars (both military and economic), real estate crashes, and, of course, what might happen to stocks over the coming few years.

What are they doing about it?

Lots.

They’re shifting where they invest, and changing how they choose to manage those investments.

How do we know this?

Because the UBS Global Family Office Report 2024 reveals several key trends and insights from 320 family offices worldwide.

A family office, if you didn’t already know, is a privately held company that handles wealth and investments for a wealthy family.

These private companies generally have one goal — to effectively grow and transfer wealth across generations.

320 family offices w/$2.6B average net worth

According to UBS:

The latest Global Family Office Report is the largest to date bringing together the insights of 320 single family offices across seven regions of the world. Representing families with an average net worth of USD 2.6 billion and covering over USD 600 billion of wealth, it confirms the report as the most authoritative analysis of this influential group of investors.’

I don’t know about you, but I don’t know that many billionaire families.

So, let’s take a look at what this most authoritative report reveals about what the world’s wealthiest family offices are doing with their money, and why.

What do they want right now?

The family offices surveryed have been rebalancing their portfolios, increasing allocations to developed market fixed income, and reducing real estate investments.

What’s driving this? Higher bond yields and the desire for greater portfolio stability​.

This means that family offices are seeking more stable and predictable returns in response to current economic conditions.

The higher bond yields offer attractive returns, leading to a preference for fixed income over the potentially more volatile real estate sector. This strategic move aims to mitigate risks and enhance portfolio resilience.

In brief: Moving away from risk and toward resilience.

What is keeping them up at night?

The family offices report a long list of concerns. Chief among them? War.

Geopolitical conflicts dominate these families’ worries, both over the next 12 months and the next five years.

Also weighing on their minds: Inflation, interest rates, a real estate correction, global recession, and climate change.

Check out the chart:

What the smart money’s worried about


Source

The takeaway here is that family offices are highly sensitive to global political and economic instability.

They anticipate continued geopolitical tension, environmental challenges, and financial volatility.

These concerns are shaping their investment and wealth management decisions.

In brief: Conflict #1 concern over both next one year, and five years.

Where are they investing?

According to the report, these families ‘appear to be strong believers in American exceptionalism, as US tech companies lead the generative AI revolution and occupy a growing share of global equity markets‘.

North America and Asia-Pacific (excluding Greater China) are the top regions for future investments.

UBS expects family offices to increase allocations to these areas due to attractive investment opportunities and growth prospects​.

This is an absolute return game


Source

This suggests that family offices see significant growth potential in North America and the Asia-Pacific region. The focus on these regions highlights confidence in their economic stability and innovative sectors, positioning these areas as favorable destinations for capital investment over the coming years.

Part of the reason for this, is the artificial intelligence trend.

In brief: US markets still the #1 investing destination.

What are they investing in, and how?

There is a renewed focus on active management as a strategy for diversification and enhanced returns.

Additionally, the report identifies generative AI as a significant investment theme (no surprises there, right?).

Many family offices plan to invest in this technology in the near future​.

AI investments most attractive


Source

As you can see, tech features strongly in the top nine investing themes among the family offices surveyed in the report.

Family offices are shifting towards more hands-on investment strategies to capitalize on market inefficiencies and emerging trends.

The interest in generative AI reflects a broader trend of embracing cutting-edge technologies that promise transformative impacts across various industries, signaling a forward-looking approach to asset management.

In brief: Disruptive tech the clear leading investing theme.

Where do they stand on sustainability?

Sustainability is becoming increasingly important for family offices.

They’re integrating ESG considerations into their investment strategies and businesses.

Healthcare and climate change are top sustainability themes, reflecting a broader commitment to positive environmental and social impacts​.

But, to be clear: Such issues are essentially matters of risk and reward to these family offices.

Climate change: Risk & reward


Source

The report finds that climate change ‘is an increasingly important topic affecting not just family offices’ investment portfolios, but also the long-term outlook of operating businesses. This is consistent with the finding that almost half (49%) of family offices view climate change as a top risk over the next five years‘.

In brief: Climate change high among risk and opportunity considerations.

So there you have it; the five major insights from the 2024 UBS Global Family Office Report.

Quote of the week

The only question with wealth is, what do you do with it?

— John D. Rockefeller

That’s it for this week’s The Benchmark email.

Forward this to anyone you know who needs to read it.

And, if one of our awesome subscribers has forwarded it to you…

Subscribe here for weekly emails with ideas, stories and content about long-term, high-performance investing!

Invest in knowledge,

Thom
Editor, The Benchmark

Unsubscribe · Preferences

All information contained in The Benchmark and on navexa.io is for education and informational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional financial or tax advice. The Benchmark and any contributors to The Benchmark are not financial professionals, and are not aware of your personal financial circumstances.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

Understanding Australian Investment Taxes for Stocks

Investing in stocks is a popular way to build wealth. However, navigating the tax implications associated with stock investments can be daunting. 

This guide explains the key tax implications associated with stock investments in Australia.

Why Understanding Investment Taxes is Crucial

Taxes on investments can significantly impact overall returns. 

Knowing the specific tax obligations and benefits can help with planning an investment strategy more effectively. 

In Australia, the two main types of taxes that affect stock investors are capital gains tax (CGT) and investment income tax (dividends, distributions etc). Each of these has its own set of rules and considerations.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT)

Capital Gains Tax is calculated on the profit you make when you sell a stock for more than you paid for it. 

Understanding how CGT works can help you plan the timing of your sales and take advantage of potential concessions, such as the CGT discount for long-term holdings. 

In our detailed post on CGT, you’ll learn:

  • What constitutes a capital gain or loss
  • How to calculate CGT
  • Strategies to minimize CGT
  • Relevant exemptions and discounts

Read more about Australian capital gains tax.

Investment Income Tax (Dividends)

Income generated from your investments, such as dividends, is also subject to taxation.

Australian tax law has specific provisions for different types of dividend income, including franking credits that can reduce your tax liability. 

Our post on investment income tax explains:

  • How dividend income is taxed
  • Understanding franking credits
  • Implications of different types of dividends
  • Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRP)

Read more about Australian investment income tax.

Taxes: Unavoidable, but not as rigid as many presume

Taxes are an inevitable part of investing, but with the right knowledge and strategies, you can optimize your tax outcomes and your investment returns. 

Our series of posts on Australian investment taxes for stocks gives you a all the key information and insights you need to navigate calculating and reporting tax as an investor. 

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automatically Track All Investments & Sort Your Tax Reporting In Minutes

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

Investment Income Tax on Stocks in Australia

Investing in stocks not only offers the potential for capital gains, but can also provide ongoing income in the form of dividends and distributions. 

However, like all income, these earnings are subject to taxation. 

Understanding the tax implications of your investment income is essential for maximizing your returns and ensuring compliance with Australian tax laws. 

This article gives you an overview of investment income tax, focusing on two primary sources; dividends from ordinary stocks, and ETF distributions.

Dividends from Ordinary Stocks

What Are Dividends?

Dividends are payments made by a company to its shareholders, typically derived from the company’s profits. 

They represent a share of the earnings and can be a reliable source of income for investors.

How Are Dividends Taxed?

In Australia, dividends are considered taxable income. 

They are usually paid out in two forms: franked and unfranked. 

Franked dividends come with franking credits, which are tax credits that can offset the tax paid by the company on its profits. 

These credits can significantly reduce your tax liability. 

Conversely, unfranked dividends do not come with these credits and are fully taxable at your marginal tax rate.

Key Considerations for Dividend Income

Franking Credits: Understanding how to utilize franking credits can reduce your tax bill.

Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRPs): Some companies offer DRPs, allowing you to reinvest your dividends to purchase more shares, which can impact your tax situation.

Holding Period Rule: To claim the franking credits, you must hold the shares ‘at risk’ for at least 45 days.

ETF Distributions

What Are ETF Distributions?

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are investment funds traded on stock exchanges, similarly to stocks. 

They pool together capital from many investors to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets. 

ETFs distribute their income, which can include dividends, interest, and capital gains, to their investors.

Tax Components of ETF Distributions

ETF distributions are more complex than ordinary stock dividends because they can include various tax components, each with its own tax implications. 

These components can include:

  • Dividends: Similar to dividends from ordinary stocks, they may be franked or unfranked.
  • Interest Income: Taxed at your marginal tax rate.
  • Capital Gains: Distributed capital gains are subject to CGT.
  • Foreign Income: May come with foreign tax credits that can offset Australian tax.
  • Non-Assessable Amounts: Such as return of capital, which can adjust the cost base of your ETF holdings.

Key Considerations for ETF Distributions

Annual Tax Statements: ETFs provide detailed tax statements, breaking down the various components of the distributions, which are crucial for accurate tax reporting.

Foreign Tax Credits: If the ETF invests in international assets, you may be entitled to foreign tax credits.

Tax Deferral Strategies: Understanding how to defer taxes on certain components of ETF distributions can enhance your tax efficiency.

Conclusion

Investment income from dividends and ETF distributions is an important part of a portfolio’s overall returns. But, it’s essential to understand the associated tax implications. 

By being informed and strategic about your investment income, you can optimize your tax outcomes and potentially boost your net returns. 

Stay tuned for our in-depth articles on dividends from ordinary stocks and ETF distributions, where we will explore each topic in greater detail and provide practical tips for managing your investment income taxes effectively.

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automatically Track All Your Dividends & Portfolio Income

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

Explained: Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on Stocks in Australia

If you invest in stocks, understanding the tax implications is crucial for optimizing your returns. 

One of the most significant taxes you’ll encounter is the Capital Gains Tax (CGT). 

This tax is applied to the profit you make when you sell your stocks for more than what you paid for them. 

This article breaks down the basics of CGT, its importance, and introduces you to some powerful strategies for effectively managing and optimizing your CGT obligations. 

What is Capital Gains Tax?

Capital Gains Tax is a tax on the profit realized from the sale of an asset. 

For stock investors, this means any gain from selling shares is subject to CGT. 

The amount of tax you owe depends on several factors, including the duration for which you held the stocks, your overall income, and any applicable discounts or exemptions.

Why CGT Matters

Properly managing your CGT can make a significant difference in your overall investment returns. 

By understanding how CGT works and employing effective strategies, you can legally minimize your tax liability, and maximize your profits. 

Whether you’re a seasoned investor or just starting out, having a solid grasp of CGT is essential for making informed investment decisions.

Key Strategies for Managing CGT

There are several strategies you can use to manage your CGT liabilities.

Each strategy has its advantages and can be suited to different investment goals and circumstances. 

These are the four primary CGT strategies:

1. FIFO (First In, First Out)

FIFO is a method where the oldest shares are sold first. This strategy can be beneficial in certain market conditions.

Read more about FIFO strategy here.

2. LIFO (Last In, First Out)

LIFO involves selling the most recently acquired shares first. This approach can help in specific scenarios, particularly in volatile markets.

Discover how LIFO can work for you.

3. Minimize Gain

Sometimes, the goal is to reduce the taxable gain. This strategy involves carefully selecting which shares to sell based on their cost base and current market value.

Learn how to minimize your capital gains.

4. Maximize Gain

In some cases, investors may wish to realize larger gains in a specific financial year, perhaps to offset losses or take advantage of lower tax rates.

Find out how to maximize your gains effectively.

Understanding CGT: Crucial for investors

Understanding and managing Capital Gains Tax is a critical aspect of successful investing in stocks. 

By leveraging the right strategies, you can significantly impact your investment outcomes. 

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automate all your CGT calculation & strategies

Understanding CGT is one thing, putting it into practice is another.

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker makes the whole process really simple.

In just a few clicks you can calculate all of your CGT for a given financial year and toggle between strategies in an instant.

Then, in years to come, all your records are there for you to refer back to. 

You can literally calculate your investment taxes the most optimal way in seconds.


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

The First In First Out Strategy (FIFO)

The FIFO strategy is the most common way of calculating capital gains. It is often the default method used by accountants and people reporting their own taxes.

The strategy is simple. When calculating the capital gain, you process trades in order of the date you bought them.

The first share parcel bought = the first one out.

Let’s look at an example of FIFO:

Purchases:

  • Buy 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Buy 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50

Sale:

  • Sell 10 shares at $4 each — Total sale value: $40

FIFO Calculation:

  • First parcel: 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Sold 10 shares for $40

Capital Gain:

  • Gain: $40 (sale value) -— $10 (cost) = $30

Since this is a capital gain, it is subject to capital gains tax.

A more complex FIFO example.

Suppose we buy the following parcels in company ABC:

  • Buy 10 shares at $2 each — Total: $20
  • Buy 5 shares at $5 each — Total: $25
  • Buy 10 shares at $3 each — Total: $30

This gives us a total of 25 shares at different price points.

Now, let’s sell 13 shares at $4 per share using the FIFO (First-In-First-Out) method.

First Parcel (a):

  • 10 shares at $2 each.
  • Total cost: $20
  • Sale value: 10 shares x $4 = $40
  • Gain: $40 — $20 = $20

Second Parcel (b):

  • Remaining 3 shares to be sold.
  • Next parcel: 5 shares at $5 each.
  • Cost for 3 shares: 3 shares x $5 = $15
  • Sale value: 3 shares x $4 = $12
  • Loss: $12 — $15 = -$3

Total Capital Gain:

  • Gain from first parcel: $20
  • Loss from second parcel: -$3
  • Total gain: $20 — $3 = $17

Therefore, the total capital gain from selling 13 shares is $17.

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automate Your CGT Strategy For Tax Reporting

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

The Minimize Gain Tax Strategy

The Minimize Gain strategy is a way of calculating capital gains. It is used when people are trying to minimize their capital gain.

The strategy is simple. When calculating the capital gain, you process trades in order ofthe price you bought them for, with the highest price parcel coming first.

Let’s look at an example of Minimize Gain:

Purchases:

  • Buy 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Buy 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50

Sale:

  • Sell 10 shares at $4 each — Total sale value: $40

Minimize Gain Calculation:

  • Highest price parcel: 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50
  • Sold 10 shares for $40

Capital Gain:

  • Gain: $40 (sale value) — $50 (cost) = $-10

Since this results in a capital loss, it is not subject to capital gains tax.

This loss can then be used to offset other capital gains, or be carried forward to future financial years.

A more complex Minimize Gain example

Suppose we buy the following parcels:

  • Buy 10 shares at $2 each — Total: $20
  • Buy 5 shares at $5 each — Total: $25
  • Buy 10 shares at $3 each -— Total: $30

This gives us a total of 25 shares at different price points.

Now, let’s sell 13 shares at $4 per share using the Minimize Gain method.

First Parcel (a):

  • 5 shares at $5 each.
  • Total cost: $25
  • Sale value: 5 shares x $4 = $20
  • Gain: $20 — $25 = $-5

Second Parcel (b):

  • Remaining 8 shares to be sold.
  • Next parcel: 10 shares at $3 each.
  • Cost for 8 shares: 8 shares x $3 = $24
  • Sale value: 8 shares x $4 = $32
  • Loss: $32 — $24 = $8

Total Capital Gain:

  • Loss from first parcel: $-5
  • Gain from second parcel: $8
  • Total gain: $8 – $5 = $3

Therefore, the total capital gain from selling 13 shares is $3.

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automate Your CGT Strategy For Tax Reporting

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.

Categories
Tax & Compliance

The Last In First Out Strategy (LIFO)

The LIFO strategy is a way of calculating capital gains. It is used when people are trying to minimize their capital gain.

This is because, usually, the last shares you bought will have a price that is closest to what you are selling them for.

The strategy is simple, when calculating the capital gain, you process trades in order of most recent purchases.

The last trade purchased = the first one out.

Let’s look at an example of LIFO:

Purchases:

  • Buy 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Buy 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50

Sale:

  • Sell 10 shares at $4 each — Total sale value: $40

LIFO Calculation:

  • Last parcel: 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50
  • Sold 10 shares for $40

Capital Gain:

  • Gain: $40 (sale value) — $50 (cost) = $-10

Since this results a capital loss, it is not subject to capital gains tax.

This loss can then be used to offset other capital gains or be carried forward to future financial years.

A more complex LIFO example.

Suppose we buy the following parcels in company ABC:

  • Buy 10 shares at $2 each — Total: $20
  • Buy 5 shares at $5 each — Total: $25
  • Buy 10 shares at $3 each — Total: $30

This gives us a total of 25 shares at different price points.

Now, let’s sell 13 shares at $4 per share using the LIFO (Last-In-First-Out) method.

First Parcel (a):

  • 10 shares at $3 each.
  • Total cost: $30
  • Sale value: 10 shares x $4 = $40
  • Gain: $40 — $30 = $10

Second Parcel (b):

  • Remaining 3 shares to be sold.
  • Next parcel: 5 shares at $5 each.
  • Cost for 3 shares: 3 shares x $5 = $15
  • Sale value: 3 shares x $4 = $12
  • Loss: $12 — $15 = -$3

Total Capital Gain:

  • Gain from first parcel: $10
  • Loss from second parcel: -$3
  • Total gain: $10 – $3 = $7

Therefore, the total capital gain from selling 13 shares is $7.

 Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automate Your CGT Strategy For Tax Reporting

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 

Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way. 

Categories
Tax & Compliance

The Maximize Gain Tax Strategy

The Maximize Gain strategy is a method of calculating capital gains. It is used when investors are trying to maximize their capital gain.

The strategy is simple. When calculating the capital gain, you process trades in order of the price you bought them for, with the lowest price parcel coming first.

An example of Maximize Gain:

Purchases:

  • Buy 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Buy 10 shares at $5 each — Total cost: $50

Sale:

  • Sell 10 shares at $4 each — Total sale value: $40

Maximize Gain Calculation:

  • Lowest price parcel: 10 shares at $1 each — Total cost: $10
  • Sold 10 shares for $40

Capital Gain:

  • Gain: $40 (sale value) — $10 (cost) = $30

A more complex Maximize Gain example.

Suppose we buy the following parcels:

  • Buy 10 shares at $2 each — Total: $20
  • Buy 5 shares at $5 each — Total: $25
  • Buy 10 shares at $3 each — Total: $30

This gives us a total of 25 shares at different price points.

Now, let’s sell 13 shares at $4 per share using the Maximize Gain method.

First Parcel (a):

  • 10 shares at $2 each.
  • Total cost: $20
  • Sale value: 10 shares x $4 = $40
  • Gain: $40 — $20 = $20

Second Parcel (b):

  • Remaining 3 shares to be sold.
  • Next parcel: 10 shares at $3 each.
  • Cost for 3 shares: 3 shares x $3 = $9
  • Sale value: 3 shares x $4 = $12
  • Loss: $12 — $9 = $3

Total Capital Gain:

  • Gain from first parcel: $20
  • Gain from second parcel: $3
  • Total gain: $20 + $3 = $23

Therefore, the total capital gain from selling 13 shares is $23.

Navexa Portfolio Tracker: Automate Your CGT Strategy For Tax Reporting

You don’t need to worry about manually tracking your investment’s gains, income, and long-term returns. 

The Navexa Portfolio Tracker automatically handles performance tracking and tax reporting for Australian investors. 


Take a free 14-day trial and see for yourself why thousands of investors trust Navexa to track their portfolio and sort their investment taxes the easy way.