Categories
Financial Literacy Financial Technology Investing

Why Your Brokerage Account Might Not Reflect Your True Portfolio Performance

Your trading account is designed to help you buy and sell investments. While it shows you a bunch of metrics related to your portfolio, it might not reflect your actual returns or performance. This post explains the difference and shows you why tracking is arguably as important as trading itself.

As a dedicated portfolio performance tracking platform serving thousands of people, the team here at Navexa communicate with our community frequently.

One of the most common questions we receive from those just beginning their portfolio tracking journey with us, is this:

Why are the investment returns in my Navexa account different from those in my trading account?’

Many of our new members are accustomed to viewing their portfolio performance through a very different lens from the one Navexa provides.

That’s because the numbers you see when you log in to your trading account aren’t so much to do with portfolio performance as they are with nominal ‘gains’ or changes in value.

In a portfolio tracker, you’re seeing your rate of return, or growth rate, over time.

In this post, we’re going to explain the difference.

We’ll explain why, in our (biased) opinion, you won’t get a clear and complete picture of your long-term investment returns from checking your trading account alone.

We’ll explain how the figures you see differ both in their calculation and the information they reflect.

We’ll touch on the extent to which brokerage fees and commissions impact your portfolio performance — and why your trading account may not reflect that impact.

We’ll explain how an investment’s true performance differs from its gains, and share with you exactly how our portfolio tracking platform calculates that performance.

And, we’ll show you how to access our purpose-built portfolio performance tracking platform free today so you can see for yourself the difference from the numbers in your trading account.

Let’s start with the key differences between trading account numbers and those in a portfolio tracker.

Trading Accounts Are For Trading — Not Portfolio Performance Tracking

In our CommSec Review, you’ll learn my honest opinion about using Australia’s most popular trading platform.

 As a trading platform, it’s great. But, as I argue in the review:

‘Having been in the market since 2013, and done my fair share of buying and selling, all I can see are two performance metrics: Today’s Change, and Total Profit/Loss.

‘To be blunt, that’s not enough for me.

‘Why?

‘Because portfolio performance is a lot more complex than just my total profit or today’s change. 

I need to see lots more.’ 

I can see today’s change in both dollar and percentage terms, my total profit/loss, my portfolio’s current market value, and the total cost (which, as you’ll see, isn’t actually my total cost).

Below this portfolio level information, there’s a holding-by-holding breakdown. This shows me the price I bought each investment at, the last price it traded for, the day’s percentage change and so forth.

Take a look:

CommSec-Review

That’s all the information available to about how my investments are progressing. Frankly, it’s not enough to satisfy my appetite for data on my journey to creating long-term wealth through investing.

Which is why I’m in favour of using a dedicated portfolio tracker.

As I said, given that we operate one such tracker, this is obviously a biased opinion. But take a look at this screen compared with the one from my trading account:

portfolio tracker

That’s the Portfolio Performance Report in Navexa. Rather than providing just a handful of metrics about profit/loss and price changes, this screen shows four key metrics:

Total Return: In both dollar and percentage terms, the Navexa portfolio tracker shows me my portfolio’s actual, annualized return net of trading fees, income and currency gains (or losses).

Capital Gain: This shows me how much of my total return is comprised of capital gains across my investments. Again, this is annualized to reflect how long I’ve been running this portfolio (otherwise, my ‘gain’ would be the same regardless of whether it had taken me one year, or twenty, to achieve).

Dividend Return: This shows me how much of my annualized return over a given time period is down to my investments generating dividend income. In my CommSec account, for example, I can’t see my income factored into my portfolio performance.

Currency Gain: While not applicable in the example above, the reality of investing across multiple markets and currencies is that foreign exchange fluctuations impact a portfolio’s returns. A dedicated portfolio tracker, like Navexa, shows this.

You’ll also see, beneath the metrics I’ve just detailed, there’s another row showing the same numbers for IOZ, a leading ASX200 ETF.

This allows me to see at a glance how the portfolio is performing relative to the ASX200 across each of these factors. In the example, you’ll see that while the annualized return and capital gain is outperforming the benchmarked fund, it is lagging behind with respect to dividend income.

This is a valuable insight — and not one I can easily get by looking at my trading account.

In the holding list below, you can see the performance breakdown for each of the investments in the portfolio.

All the numbers you see reflect more than just the price movement of the investments. Here’s an example.

Fees & Commissions Impact Your Performance (But May Not Be Reflected In Your Brokerage Account)

My trading account doesn’t show me how fees are impacting my performance. That’s probably because I pay my broker to execute my trades for me. But consider this:        

Let’s say I make 50 trades a year for 10 years at a cost of $20 a trade.

That’s $10,000. At the end of the 10 years, say I have 50 investments in the portfolio. When it’s time to sell out and collect the cash I’ve (hopefully) earned as the portfolio’s total value has appreciated over that time… that’s another $1,000 for all the sell trades on the 50 holdings at the end of the period.

The impact of fees? $11,000.

If the portfolio had started with $50,000, and we assume a 100% total return over the 10 years (that’s a 7.18% annualized return), the investor has, on paper, doubled their money.

Hooray! Right? Not quite. 

You can see how this plays out in terms of actual portfolio performance.

For our purposes in this post, I hope you can see that trading fees play a major part in determining your true performance. Which is why you need to be able to easily see your returns net of that impact — as opposed to hidden away, as they are in many trading accounts.

Fees Aren’t The Only Factor: A Dedicated Portfolio Tracker Helps You Measure Everything Impacting Your Performance

While my CommSec account is, in my opinion, brilliant for conducting market and investment research (their tools and resources are second to none across Australian trading platforms), it’s severely limited in showing portfolio performance details.

When you really dive into the world of long-term wealth building, there are four factors that deeply affect your real returns.

Remember, I’m not talking about gains here. I’m talking about our net performance after every factor impacting a portfolio has been accounted for.

Here are the four factors:

Time: While it might be tempting to look at your overall returns going all the way back to the first day of a portfolio’s life, this can result in us misinterpreting our performance. My favourite illustration of this? Would you rather make a 500% return over one year, or 10? There’s a huge difference, and we all know it. Leaving time out of our portfolio performance calculations is straight up wilful blindness.

Trading Fees: As we lay out in detail, trading fees can and often do have a significant impact on portfolio performance. Looking at your tasty triple digit ‘gain’ in your trading account might feel nice, but when you add up the cost of all the buying and selling it’s taken to achieve that gain, the reality is probably not quite so glorious.

I have a friend who sold some crypto recently and, thanks to my incessant nagging about true performance, accepted that, while they’d made a healthy profit, they’d handed over a huge percentage in exchange and account fees.

Income: This one’s a counterbalance to time and trading fees. If I have a $100,000 portfolio that generates $10,000 in income every year, that’s a massive factor in my overall performance and returns. While my trading account only shows me my capital gains on an investment, my portfolio tracker shows me my total return including dividend income — and breaks down how much of my return constitutes income versus capital gains.

Taxation: Now this one’s a little different. But the reality is — especially for those of us investing with a view to financial independence or early retirement — we must pay a significant percentage of our profits to the government when we sell out of investments. This is important to consider when you’re assessing what you’ll gain from buying and selling stocks. It doesn’t impact your portfolio performance per se, but it does massively impact your financial outcome as you draw down or completely exit a portfolio.

(FYI: Navexa provides automated CGT and income tax obligation reports, plus an Unrealized Capital Gain report to help you assess and forecast your portfolio’s taxes.)

Currency gain is also important, but of course not all of us invest beyond our home markets. In Australia, in fact, the majority of investors doesn’t stray beyond the ASX, although this is gradually shifting as more services arrive to facilitate offshore investing through new platforms and apps.

Another point here is that Navexa’s portfolio performance calculation is money weighted. That means it accounts for inflows and outflows of cash in your portfolio. This is because the reality for many of us isn’t as simple as making an initial investment and leaving it alone. Rather, we buy and sell as we go.

A money weighted return is different from a time weighted return, which doesn’t account for cash inflows and outflows.

Navexa portfolio tracker

How Navexa Tracks Your Portfolio’s Performance With Automated Accuracy

When I set out to build Navexa, I just wanted a tool that would save me having to combine the data in my trading account with my own manual calculations in order to work out my true portfolio performance.

I — like many of the Navexa community — am a long-term, buy-and-hold investor to whom strong, annualized returns matter more than eye-grabbing one-off gains.

I’ve been learning about money and wealth creation for a long time. Everything I’ve learned has taught me it’s far better to work with hard data than skewed or incomplete information about a portfolio.

This is why the Navexa Portfolio Tracker, today, is one of the leading portfolio tracking platforms in Australia. We calculate annualized portfolio performance that accounts for all the factors I mention above.

Once you load your portfolio into Navexa, you start seeing true performance over the long term. You can see at a glance your capital gains, currency gains, investment income — all net of your trading fees.

You can run comprehensive tax reports with a couple of clicks. You can track & analyze more than 8,000 ASX & US-listed stocks and ETFs, plus cryptos, cash accounts and unlisted investments (like property).

And, you can go even deeper, running reports like Portfolio Contributions, which shows you in chart form which of your investments are boosting (and which are dragging down) your overall performance.

Like I said, I’m biased, since I started Navexa. But I wouldn’t have had to — and thousands of satisfied members wouldn’t be tracking with us — were it not for my trading account failing to provide a full and clear picture of my portfolio performance.

Trading accounts are for trading. Navexa is for portfolio tracking. If you’re doing the former, you should, IMHO be doing the latter, too.

Happy tracking — create an account here (zero obligation & no credit card required!).

Categories
Financial Technology Investing

How Trading Fees Impact Long-Term Portfolio Performance

Many investors are not aware that trading fees can impact their long term portfolio performance. When you consider that 50 trades a year at $20 a trade becomes $1,000 in fees, you can see how trading fees can become a substantial part of your investment costs.

This post discusses what trading and other brokerage fees are, some common strategies for minimizing their impact, how to calculate the true cost of buying stocks of ETFs, plus a couple of other key ideas around factoring trading fees into a long term investment strategy. 

It might be tempting to ignore trading fees and focus only on your nominal gains — the current price of an investment relative to the price you bought it for. But doing so leaves out a key part of the picture.

Many people assume that a flat rate trading fee is enough to cover all their costs. But this isn’t strictly true. Going back to the 50 trades a year at $20 example, on a $50,000 portfolio, the fees equate to 2%. Were you to make 100 trades, that would jump up to 4%. 

And that’s just talking about commission on buy and sell trades. It doesn’t take into account other brokerage expenses, like account fees or inactivity fees, for example. Nor does it account for other potentially significant factors, like currency gains and losses.

We’re going to walk you through trading fees — from the basic principles and current market prices in Australia and beyond, to a few specialist examples of trading fees in action. We’re especially going to focus on understanding how these necessary (for the most part) expenses impact long term portfolio performance — which is your actual, ‘real money’ returns as opposed to the nominal gains you might be used to seeing in your brokerage account. 

Plus, we’ll show you how Navexa — the portfolio tracking & reporting platform hosting this blog — helps you automatically calculate your portfolio’s true performance net of trading fees and other factors that impact on returns. 

index funds

Back to Basics: What Is A Trading Fee?

Strictly speaking, trading fees are themselves just one type of brokerage fee.

A brokerage fee describes the various fees you’ll pay to buy and sell stocks through a trading platform or stock broker.

These break down into trading and non-trading fees. The former means charges you’ll need to pay associated with a given trade. That could mean broker commission, margin rate (for borrowed capital) or a currency conversion if you’re trading, for example, US stocks through an Australian portal.

The latter refers to other costs associated with your investment account, for example account opening fees, inactivity fees and so forth.

Trading fees will be calculated either as a percentage of an order’s total value, or as a flat fee (often applying to a range of values, like $20K-$50K, for example).

Generally speaking, the more complicated your investment strategy, and the more different types of assets you invest in, the higher your brokerage fees may become.

Mutual funds, options, futures and other more complex asset classes will probably carry unique fees and fee structures, too.

A mutual fund is often judged in part by its expense ratio. This is the percentage of assets (money) the mutual fund consumes in expenses. You can think of your own portfolio’s investment costs in similar terms — by considering your expense ratio, just as you would a mutual fund.

OK, so given that fees exist and can’t be avoided if you’re investing in the markets, let’s look at how they affect an investment portfolio.

Types of Brokerage Fees

  • Trading fees: Costs associated with making a trade.
  • Non-Trading fees: Costs associated with the administration of having a trading account.

The Impact Of Fees On Long Term Portfolio Performance

Take, for example, a 10-year investment strategy.

The investor creates a portfolio with 50 different stocks, ETFs and mutual fund holdings in it.

Each trade, on average, costs $20 — that’s buying and selling.

That’s $1,000 worth of fees in the first year, provided they don’t sell anything.

Every year, the investor adds to existing positions, sells out of underperforming ones, and enters new positions as they shift their capital around trying to optimize the portfolio. But let’s assume the total number of holdings remains at 50.

Let’s say they make a further 50 trades a year — another $1,000 in fees. Over the 10 year period in this example, that’s $10,000. And when it’s time to sell out and collect the cash they’ve (hopefully) earned as their portfolio’s total value has appreciated over that time… that’s another $1,000 for all the sell trades on the 50 holdings at the end of the period.

The impact of fees? $11,000.

If the portfolio had started with $50,000, and we assume a 100% total return over the 10 years (that’s a 7.18% annualized return), the investor has, on paper, doubled their money. Hooray! Right? Not quite.

We haven’t factored the $11,000 in fees into the equation yet.

The portfolio started with $50,000. Ten years later, it was worth $100,000 — a $50,000 ‘gain’ if you don’t look beneath the surface numbers. Minus the $11,000 in fees, that $50,000 ‘gain’ comes down to $39,000.

So that 100% gain comes down to 78%, and the 7.18% annualized return across the decade comes down to 5.94%.

If these numbers are confusing, bear with me. Here’s a couple more that show the impact of trading fees on this theoretical portfolio’s long-term return (remember, nominal ‘gains’ aren’t a real measure of performance).

  • The trading fees in this case dragged the dollar return of the portfolio down 22%.
  • The fees account for a 22% loss in total percentage gain across the life of the portfolio.
  • The portfolio’s annualized performance suffered 17.2% thanks to the fees.

This, in a nutshell is why you need to care about trading fees in the context of assessing your portfolio performance. While it might be more comfortable to write them off as a necessary expense, you risk giving yourself an inflated and unrealistic idea of your true portfolio performance.

In the example above, we’re only talking about a $100,000 portfolio value and $11,000 in fees. For multi-million-dollar portfolios — especially those comprising large numbers of trades and complex investments which may carry higher fees — the impact could be far more significant.

So let’s look at common ways investors try to minimize their trading fees impacting their portfolio performance.

Impact of Fees of Hypothetical Portfolio

  1. 100% ‘nominal’ gain actually a 78% real return
  2. Annualized return drops from 7.18% to 5.94%
  3. 22% total impact across portfolio’s 10 year timespan 
  4. 17.2% impact on annualized performance
management fees

A Couple Of Strategies To Reduce The Effects Of Trading Fees

Given the fact that brokerage fees can eat into your returns and performance, it follows that to maximize your performance, you should aim to minimize fees.

How do you do this?

Firstly, avoid the most costly mistake of all; being ignorant not just to the necessary existence of trading fees, but of their undeniable (if easy to ignore) impact on your portfolio.

Rather than turning a blind eye to trading fees and focusing only on your nominal gains, it’s far better to arm yourself with knowledge. This is the first step of any fee-minimization strategy.

Secondly, there’s a general rule you can apply to your investing strategy:

Generally speaking, more trades = more fees.

Morningstar reports that investors pay about three times as much in fees when they invest in an actively managed fund as opposed to an ETF.

‘Actively managed’ here means that the fund managers execute plenty of trades in their pursuit of optimal performance for the fund. And guess what? These plenty of trades generate plenty of fees, which get passed on to the fund’s investors.

The same applies to self-directed investing. I have a friend who’s invested in cryptocurrencies. Over about the past five years, she’s traded in and out of different crypto assets as she’s hunted for mythically massive returns, not paying any attention to how much each trade was stinging her in fees.

She’s like an actively managed fund, always making moves as she chases gains, not thinking about her expense ratio!

I convinced her to load her trades into Navexa and we saw very quickly that had she just parked all her money in Bitcoin from the beginning, not only would her capital gains be more impressive (turns out plenty of those sh… smaller crypto assets didn’t go to the moon, crazy right?), but her fees would have been drastically lower.

If you go back to the example I made earlier in this post, 50 trades a year at $20 a pop is of course going to cost you more than doing half that.

Those are two general tactics for minimizing trading fees. There are plenty of others.

Another benefit of being aware of fees and how they’ll impact a portfolio is that you might be better informed when choosing who to trade with in the first place.

With the explosion of low or no-commission trading platforms in recent years, you’re more spoilt for choice when it comes to choosing a broker that’s not going to eat too much of your performance in fees.

While a $10,000 trade costs $29.95 with ANZ, the same trade could cost you a third of that with some of the newer, more competitively-priced platforms.

Knowing the different brokers’ fee structures inside out is a smart way to assess which will suit you best, since you can extrapolate your trading history to get an idea of exactly what the impact of a given broker’s fees might be.

Takeaways

  • Build your knowledge of fees and fee structures rather than ignore them
  • Consider the extent to which your stock or fund investing could be more passive and potentially generate fewer fees
  • Look at fee structures and your unique investing behaviours when comparing & choosing a broker

What Is A Round Turn Trade And Why It’s Important To Understand Before You Make Trades In Your Account

You might have heard of the term ‘round turn trade’ or ‘round trip trade’.

This is a central idea you should grasp before charging into an investment strategy.

It refers to an investment’s total lifecycle. As we mentioned above, paying the trading fee when you buy a stock is only half the story. You’ll pay again when you sell, too.

The phrase is most commonly used in futures trading, but it applies to regular investing, too.

Say you buy $2000 worth of shares and your trading fee is $20. You sell them at $2500 a year later, incurring another trading fee. Your ‘round trip’ investing in this stock has cost you $40 in fees.

The $500 capital gain is really a net $460 gain — 8% lower net of fees.

Of course, if you’re investing and trading in Australia, your round trip doesn’t end with selling out of a position.

In this example, you’ve earned a capital gain, so you’ll (probably) need to pay tax on that, too.

Taxation isn’t a trading fee per se, but in the context of thinking about your portfolio’s round turn or round trip, it’s important to remember all the factors that will impact your returns.

How To Calculate Your Own Personal Cost Per Trade

Another useful way to incorporate your understanding — end expectation — of fees into your investing is by factoring fees into your trading costs.

Keeping with the previous example, you’ve bought $2,000 worth of shares (call it 500 shares at $4 each). But the cost of buying those shares is really $2020 when you include the fee. When you sell out of the position, you get $2460 back, net of fees.

So while in your trading account it may look like you put $2,000 in and got $2,500 back, those are really just nominal figures that reflect the value of your position at the beginning and end of the trade.

Your real money, round trip start and finish numbers are different.

Not by much, in this example, but still statistically significant — especially when you apply this method across large, long-term portfolios with hundreds or thousands of trades, and other trading and non-trading fees associated with managed funds, margin trading and other potentially costly investment types.

Why Do Some Brokers Have Lower Commissions Than Others, And How Does That Affect Your Investment Returns?

Some call it the ‘Robin Hood effect’, others the ‘race to zero’. However you characterize it, competition in the low or no-fees brokerage space has become hotter than ever.

What began with newer, online-only brokers trying to break into the market and compete with the huge, established players has now embroiled pretty much the whole stock broking space in fierce price wars.

RobinHood, SelfWealth, STAKE and myriad other players in the market have forced the established brokers to compete on price and/or justify their costs with new and more sophisticated product offerings.

Check out our CommSec review to learn more about Australia’s largest broker and the fees it charges.

This ‘race to zero’ is part of a much bigger trend. According to a paper from Columbia Business School, quoted here:

The huge change for [trading costs] really came about in 1975 in what people now refer to as May Day. That’s when the regulators abolished fixed-rate commissions.

‘Before May Day, it cost the same amount per share to trade 10 shares as it did to trade 10,000 shares. The brokers would make out like bandits, taking their 2% or so from each trade. I’ve seen estimates that show trading costs have fallen around 80-90% since 1975.’

In other words, it’s never been as cost-effective to invest in the markets as it is today. The rise of online-only trading platforms, micro-investing and the broader mobilization of a new generation of investors means you can now minimize the impact fees have on your portfolio performance more than ever.

Especially if you approach your investing with the correct knowledge and strategy.

Resources to Learn More About Trading Fees

Navexa portfolio tracker

Navexa Helps You Track Your True Portfolio Performance Net Of Fees

Hopefully, you’re one of those who wants to track your portfolio’s true performance, net of fees, so that you can understand what your real returns are as opposed to the nominal ‘gains’ others might settle for.

If that’s you, we have good news. We’ve created the Navexa Portfolio Tracker to show you your true, annualized portfolio performance net of fees, dividend income, and currency gains & losses.

Whether you’re a relatively passive investor happy to let a managed fund grow your wealth for you (despite potentially higher fees), or you’re taking care of your own research and investing decisions on a stock-by-stock basis, you’ll see your portfolio as it really is in our easy-to-use platform.

You can track, analyze and compare every stock and ETF across the ASX, NYSE and NASDAQ across multiple portfolios.

Plus, you can drill down into the data to more clearly see the trends that matter — which stocks are performing the best (and worst), which holdings are earning the most (and least) income for you, and lots more.

You can test Navexa’s true portfolio performance tracking tools and reports for 14 days free.

Start your trial here!