Categories
Financial Literacy Investing

Dividend Reinvestment Plans: Some of the Key Pros & Cons

Dividends don’t always arrive in the form of cash. Some stocks allow investors to automatically reinvest their dividend payments into additional shares. Here, we take a look at some of the positives and negatives associated with reinvesting investment income instead of receiving dividend payouts as cash.

So, you’re collecting dividend income from your investments.

Great!

Investing in quality dividend-paying stocks can be a brilliant way to boost your returns — see how one of my income investments paid back nearly half my capital in just four years.

There’s more to dividend investing than just getting paid to hold shares, though.

Some stocks don’t simply pay you a cash dividend on a regular basis.

They give you the option to reinvest your dividend income into additional shares.

As you’ll see in our post explaining dividend reinvestment plans (DRPs), this option can have powerful effects on long-term returns.

On a long enough timeline, a DRP could be the difference between making a few hundred thousand dollars on an investments, and a couple of million.

But that doesn’t mean that choosing a DRP for your investment income is always going to be the default best option.

In this post, I’m going to go through three pros and three cons of reinvesting your dividends.

I should point out, though, that this is by no means an exhaustive list.

(Nor does it constitute financial advice.) 

DRP Pros: Compounding Through Increased Exposure & Saving On Brokerage Fees

  • Compounding

I like what Einstein (allegedly) said about compound interest being the eighth wonder of the world.

The true wonder of compounding only becomes apparent with enough time.

As a long-sighted value investor, I try to let time work for me.

By that, I mean I look for quality, undervalued stocks and I buy them with a view to going ‘The Full Buffett’ and holding onto them for decades.

If you’re prepared to be patient and hold an investment for a long time, a DRP might work in your favour.

Why? Because over time, not only will your additional shares compound the size of your overall position, but you’ll receive more shares each time (since dividend amounts relate directly to your position size).

In some cases, with the right companies over a long enough time, you could double the size of your position simply by allowing reinvested dividends to accumulate.

  • Increasing Your Exposure

Another advantage of using the DRP on an investment is that, over time (and again, the more time you allow, the more powerful the effect could be) is that accumulating more shares increases your exposure to the stock.

If you’ve selected a quality company to invest in, and the company’s stock increases in price over time, you will have more shares exposing your portfolio to that capital gain.

In simple terms, if you had 1,000 shares worth $10,000 in a company that rose 100%, you’d have 1,000 shares worth $20,000.

But if you’d reinvested your dividends and that had netted you, say, an extra 200 shares, you’d have 1,200 worth $24,000.

  • Acquiring Extra Shares Without Paying For Them

One of the factors many investors neglect to consider when calculating their TRUE returns is brokerage fees and other transaction costs.

Generally, when you make a trade, you’ll pay your broker a fee to facilitate that trade.

This is another reason why I favour longer term, relatively inactive investing as opposed to buying and selling frequently, trying to chase trends or predict the market.

If I hold a single investment for 20 years, the fact that I paid, say, $100 brokerage becomes virtually irrelevant when I annualize my return.

And if you prefer not to let fees eat into your returns, you might like the DRP option, too.

Some stocks’ DRPs allow you to accumulate the additional shares for zero fees, since you’re not buying through a broker but rather have a direct agreement with the company itself.

So, those are three upsides to DRPs. In my view, investing this way only really delivers a meaningful advantage if you allow enough time for compounding, increased capital exposure, and the benefits of not paying brokerage on your additional shares to accumulate.

Now, let’s take a look at the downsides of DRPs.

DRP Downsides: Opportunity Cost, Less Control, And The Flipside of Increased Exposure

  • You Don’t Control The Price Of Your Additional Shares

Acquiring additional shares through a DRP is great, in principle. Like I said, on a long enough timeline, and provided you’ve invested in a quality company that grows stronger and more profitable, it’s a sound idea to acquire more shares.

But like I also said, I’m a value investor.

I only buy shares in a stock I calculate is trading under its intrinsic value.

If you share that approach to buying stock, you may find that a DRP has an unintended downside; acquiring additional shares at prices above what you’d choose to pay were you analysing the stock with fresh eyes as a new investor.

Not only do you not get to choose the price you pay for each bundle of additional shares, you don’t get to choose the timing of the reinvestment, either.

So, in terms of control and in the spirit of not paying more than you want to, a DRP may be a downside.

  • Opportunity Cost

The essence of the DRP is that you receive shares instead of cash.

As we know, this can have plenty of benefits, especially if you’re investing for the long term and intend to let the power of compounding work its magic over.

However, one potential downside of opting for a DRP over a cash dividend, is that you’ll miss out on opportunities to do things with that investment income other than automatically convert it into additional shares.

In other words, opting to reinvest your dividends could have a negative impact on your portfolio diversification.

Consider early 2021’s cryptocurrency bull market.

Say you’d been reinvesting your dividends in one of your stocks for five years, and you’d turned a $10,000 position into a $20,000 position (between capital gains and the DRP).

Not bad, a 100% gain.

But say you’d taken the cash dividend instead and invested it in Bitcoin, you could have exposed that income to far greater capital gains.

Of course, this is a simplistic example that benefits from hindsight (five years ago and even today, many still wouldn’t recommend cryptocurrency as a sound investment).

The takeaway here is, while a DRP can be a powerful tool in compounding your investment income and position size, it can also cost you the opportunity to invest your dividends in other assets and opportunities.

  • The Flipside Of Increased Capital Exposure

This potential downside is a reflection of the potential positive we mentioned above — increasing your exposure.

Because, of course, if a DRP increases your exposure to a quality stock’s capital gains, it can equally expose your capital to greater losses.

This is something you should always take into account if you’re reinvesting your dividends back into a stock — and of course any time you invest — your capital is always at risk.

While the stock market does generally rise over the long term, that doesn’t mean every stock does.

Everything, in theory, can go to zero.

So if you were invested in a company that collapsed or went bankrupt, that increased exposure through your DRP could result in you losing more money than you might have if you had simply collected your dividends as cash.

Dividend Income: To Take The Cash, Or Reinvest?

Dividend reinvestment can be a valuable tool for the investor.

Of course, like any decision we’re faced with when trying to build wealth in the market, there are pros and cons.

Using a DRP to compound your income and capital can be a powerful way to grow your portfolio.

Compounding, increased capital exposure, and zero or few brokerage fees are in my view key benefits of utilizing a DRP.

On the other hand, increased exposure could bring increased risk, while DRPs may also inhibit you from investing in other opportunities or diversifying your portfolio.

The other key potential downside to DRPs is that you lose control over the timing and price of the additional shares your dividends will earn you.

In my opinion — and bear in mind I am not a professional investor or advisor — it’s important to view a DRP investment in both the wider context of your overall portfolio and financial goals, and — in my opinion — through the lens of long term investing.

I hope this post on the pros and cons of DRPs has been helpful for you.

I’ll leave you with one of my favourite investing quotes, from Warren Buffet’s business partner, Charlie Munger:

“The big money is not in the buying and selling. But in the waiting.”

Categories
Financial Literacy Investing

Ex-Dividend Dates Explained: What, When & Why

What does it mean when a stock goes ‘ex-dividend’? As you’ll see in this brief guide, the ex-dividend date is an important part of the income investing — and, potentially the value investing — process. We explain what it means and why you should understand its impacts when buying stocks for both capital gains and dividend income.

If you’re new to income investing, you may think earning dividends from stocks you own is simple and straightforward.

In principle, it is; You buy shares in a profitable company that pays a portion of its earnings out as cash dividends to investors who’ve traded their capital for shares in the business.

I’ve personally been receiving income from some of my investments for years now.

I’ve seen first-hand how powerful a steady stream of dividends can be for your overall portfolio performance.

But understanding investment income is a little more complex than just buying and holding any stock that pays a dividend.

Here, we explain the finer points of dividend payments.

As you’ll see, the date a company pays out a dividend to shareholders is just one of the key dates you need to be aware of as an investor.

What Does It Mean When A Stock Goes Ex-Dividend?

There are four key dates around dividend payments.

The first is the declaration date. This is the date the company announces it will issue a cash dividend in the future.

Second, you have the record date. That’s the date the company goes through its list of shareholders to confirm those who are eligible to receive the upcoming dividend.

Third is the ex-dividend date.

This is an especially important one, as it determines which shareholders will be considered eligible on the record date.

The ex-dividend date is commonly set two days before the record date.

This means you must own shares in the company on or before that date in order to qualify for the upcoming dividend.

Finally, there’s the dividend payable date, or simply the payment date.

That’s exactly what it sounds like; the day the company pays out the dividend to the shareholders who’ve met the criteria to receive it.

Those are the four key stages of a dividend.

The ex-dividend date is arguably the most important because it’s the cut-off point for determining whether or not you will receive the next scheduled payment for your shares.

Is It Better To Buy A Stock Before Or After The Ex-Dividend Date?

In my opinion — and everything on our blog is opinion, it’s not financial advice — there’s no great advantage to buying before or after the ex-dividend date.

But that’s because I personally prefer to hold any shares I buy for a relatively long time.

If you’re looking for a quick cash gain, you may consider trying to buy shares in a stock right before the ex-dividend date.

On paper, that might not seem like a bad idea.

In reality, the market adjusts the stock price when a company trades ex-dividend. This takes account of the cash payment being made to shareholders.

Generally, the share price adjusts by the amount of the dividend, meaning if you buy right near the ex-dividend date and sell right after the dividend payable date, you could take a small capital loss despite having captured the income.

In other words, trying to dip in and out of a stock to grab the dividend may not work out as profitably as you’d hoped.

Even if that weren’t the case… and you could dip in and out of a stock quick and easy to claim some fast income, you’d still have fees and taxes to contend with, which would eat into your gains (see the full list of factors that impact your true portfolio performance).

Still, there probably are people out there who buy and sell around ex-dividend dates regardless of the downsides. So…

Are Ex-Dividend Dates Value Investing Opportunities?

I personally follow the value investing strategy set out by Benjamin Graham and, later, Warren Buffet.

I prefer to look for high quality companies trading below their true value.

If I find one of those, I’d rather buy shares and hold them for a (very) long time than trade frequently.

So, for me, an ex-dividend date isn’t necessarily an investment opportunity in itself.

But, if I calculate that this is a stock I want to own, I might look to get in before the ex-dividend date.

Having said that, since my investment strategy is a long term one, missing a single dividend payment by buying in after the ex-dividend date wouldn’t bother me one bit.

I’d be looking to hold (that’s stockspeak for ‘hodl’ if you’re joining us from the crypto world) those shares for many years, ideally capturing a long term capital gain plus the income the company pays out over that time.

But, that is just me. Not everyone invests the way I do (learn about my experience buying my first ever shares to see why I invest the way I do).

I hope this post has shed some light on ex-dividend dates, the process they’re part of, and the impacts they can have on both stock prices and investment income.

Categories
Investing

The Big Short (Squeeze): Unpacking The GameStop Saga

A subreddit community takes on the Wall Street elite. The battleground? A struggling brick-and-mortar games retailer. What does the GameStop short squeeze saga reveal about the changing investment landscape… and investing in a market where powerful, internet-driven trends can make seemingly worthless assets explode higher for no real reason?

Make no mistake; The GameStop story runs deeper than a group of investors collaborating on Reddit to push a stock to all-time highs for the sake of it.

ICYMI, GameStop, a video game and consumer electronics company floundering in recent years amid failed investments and the rising dominance of online retail, rocketed from $US17.25 to $US325 in the first month of 2021.

Why?

Because the users of r/wallstreetbets orchestrated a massive ‘short squeeze’ in a bid to push GameStop’s share price up to $1,000.

For some, the mission appears similar to a ‘crypto pump’, where investors band together to drive a tiny, cheap cryptocurrency’s price higher so they can cash out for massive, quick profits.

For others, however, the GameStop short squeeze appears to be about more than getting rich quick.

Because if the internet raiders can continue to push the stock’s price higher, they’ll cause the hedge funds and Wall Street elites trying to ‘short’ GameStop to lose large sums of money.

In other words, this is like the stock market equivalent of the people rising up against the vastly more powerful individuals whose wealth traditionally dominates the stock market and whose influence and power traditionally rakes in the biggest profits — often at the expense of everyday investors.

What Is A Short Squeeze?

To understand what a short squeeze is, you need to know what shorting is.

In simple terms, short selling is when you borrow shares from a broker and sell them for a given price, under an agreement that you will buy those shares back at a given point in the future.

If you borrowed $5,000 worth of shares in a company you thought was going to be trading 50% lower in three months — and your prediction proved correct — you’d be able to buy those shares back for $2,500, return them to your broker and pocket the other $2,500.

That’s the basic idea of short selling.

It’s a way to potentially profit from prices falling instead of rising.

A short squeeze is when upward price movement puts pressure on short sellers whose shorts are nearing expiry.

GameStop is a prime example.

Investors buy up the stock, driving the price higher. This pressures the short sellers to buy too, since they are trying to protect themselves against the losses they’ll incur if the stock doesn’t fall to their target price by the agreed date.

Another way to think of a short squeeze is that it’s a battle between those wanting to profit from higher prices, and those wanting to profit from lower prices.

Veteran Trader: Beware Ego, Bias & Thinking You Can Resist The Trend

Jason McIntosh is the founder of Motion Trader, an algorithmic trading and stock market advisory service.

Jason’s been investing and trading professionally for three decades.

Here, he shares his thoughts on short selling, the GameStop story and a dangerous idea many investors grapple with.

“Short selling is a dangerous game, even for the professionals.”

— Motion Trader’s Jason McIntosh

It’s a situation where there is unlimited downside and limited upside i.e. the most a stock can fall is 100%, but it could rise many times more (as the short sellers of GameStop experienced).

It’s basically the opposite to what investors should be looking for.

I target set-ups where I have “asymmetric” risk/reward. That is, I need the potential of making much more than I’m risking.

While short sellers can get this dynamic, it’s nowhere near as good as when you buy shares.

Before I invest in anything, I ask the question: Could I make a multiple of what I’m risking?

“No matter what your numbers say, all that matters is what the market does.”

— Motion Trader’s Jason McIntosh

Another thing to bear in mind is around following the price action.

I’m sure there was ego involved with the GameStop short sellers.

They did their numbers and they were sure they were right — this probably made resistant to taking an early loss.

But no matter what your numbers say, all that matters is what the market does.

It’s more important to exit and stay in the game, than fight on and risk being wiped out (something many retail investors experience).

“Simple lesson: Don’t fight the trend…”

— Motion Trader’s Jason McIntosh

The final point is that markets can run further than just about anyone can imagine.

This is why investing with the trend and letting winners run is so important.

GameStop, Tesla, Bitcoin, and many others had huge gains amidst widespread disbelief.

Many people have lost large sums of money fighting the trend. Others left big sums on the table by exiting too early.

Simple lesson: Don’t fight the trend and let your profits run.  

Buy The Hype? Or Ignore The Noise?

The conflict between fundamental value and market behaviour has always been a point of contention for investors.

The GameStop story — still unfolding at the time of writing — shows you two things.

First, the power of the market to make investors abandon ideas of fundamental value and pile in on a trend.

GameStop isn’t Tesla. It’s a beat-up traditional retailer that probably would still be trading flat were it not for r/wallstreetbets.

Second, the power of the internet to challenge the financial establishment.

As Jason points out, Bitcoin and GameStop aren’t that different.

One could take the view that they’re junk assets devoid of any meaningful fundamental value.

Or, one could look at the gains and accept that when a trend takes hold and creates events like these, you’re better off being in to win than sitting on the sidelines.

Whichever way you prefer to view it, the reality is that the GameStop short squeeze is going to make (and lose) a lot of people a lot of money.